by Rick Bonifield
Monday, July 27, 2026
If we are honest, many of us find the word "evangelism" deeply uncomfortable. It conjures up images of high-pressure sales pitches, awkward conversations on airplanes, and emotionalist guilt trips. In modern American church culture, we have grown accustomed to conversion tactics centered on mass suggestion, camp-meeting hysteria, and highly scripted, urgent appeals. From the rapid proliferation of the "Sinner's Prayer" to the ubiquitous "Ask-Jesus-into-your-heart" recipes, we have squeezed the beautiful gospel of Christ into a rigid, high-pressure mold.
But here is the good news: evangelism was never meant to be awkward. When we return to the biblical and historic Restoration model of sharing the faith, we discover a way of talking about Jesus that is rational, relational, deeply respectful of human free will, and centered on teaching rather than manipulation.
The Theological Root of Our Anxiety
Why does modern evangelism feel so unnatural? Much of our anxiety stems from a flawed, subjective theology of conversion. For centuries, Western Christianity has been haunted by an Augustinian and Calvinistic view of human nature. Under this framework, sin has left the human moral will so utterly disabled and "totally depraved" that a person cannot even choose to respond to God. Consequently, conversion requires God to unilaterally and miraculously bypass the human will, injecting faith directly into a passive soul through irresistible, spiritual "illumination.”
The late theologian Dr. Roger Chambers brilliantly exposed the horror of this model by comparing it to a character from Isaac Asimov's science fiction series, Second Foundation. In the novel, a supernatural mutant tyrant named "The Mule" uses telepathic surgery to directly invert the wills of his enemies, forcing them to love and serve him. Chambers asked a haunting question: How can we believe in a God who converts his children the way Asimov’s Mule converts his subjects?. A conversion that bypasses human free choice is a counterfeit conversion that leaves God with "an empty sovereignty, with a family of counterfeit children.”.
When we carry this "Mule-like" theology into our evangelism, we feel immense pressure to create a mystical "zap" or an intense emotional crisis in the person we are talking to. We feel that if we don't say the magic words or trigger a highly emotional breakdown, they won't be "illumined.”. We substitute emotionalism for instruction, and the altar call for the Bible study. This is where the awkwardness is born.
The Restoration Alternative: Walter Scott and the "New Evangelism"
In the early nineteenth century, the American Restoration Movement sought to rescue the church from this emotional hysteria. Pioneers like Walter Scott rejected the chaotic camp meetings of the Great Awakening, where seekers were encouraged to "bark like dogs" or "jerk themselves to pieces" while waiting for a direct physical sign from the Holy Spirit.
Instead, Scott sat down with his Greek New Testament and systematically analyzed the Book of Acts to discover how the apostles actually shared the faith. The result was what historians call the "New Evangelism.”
Scott’s primary breakthrough was realizing that faith is not a mystical infusion; rather, "Christianity is a taught religion, and people believe what they're taught”. The Holy Spirit does not whisper secrets into our ears or magically filter out truth from error; the meaning of the Bible is objective, residing in the text itself. Scott's baseline thesis was revolutionary in its simplicity: "Belief in the Messiahship of Jesus rests on rational proof, while everything else in the Christian system rests on His authority.”
When you realize that evangelism is simply a process of teaching and learning, the awkwardness vanishes. You are not a spiritual surgeon trying to perform telepathic surgery on someone’s brain. You are simply a teacher presenting historically reliable, rational evidence of what God has done.
Worldview Over Therapy: Presenting the Whole Picture
Another reason evangelism feels awkward today is that we have dramatically shrunk the gospel. We live in a highly psychologized culture, and the church has largely capitulated to this trend. In many pulpits and personal conversations, "theology is out, therapy is in.” We present Jesus not as God the Sovereign Redeemer, but as a "model of psychological fitness" or a cosmic therapist whose primary job is to boost our self-affirmation.
But biblical Christianity is not just a self-help program or a narrow "gospel recipe" to escape hell. Christianity is a comprehensive worldview. It is a massive jigsaw puzzle that explains all of reality, and Jesus is the central figure set in that wider framework.
When we share our faith, we must help others put this puzzle together by starting with the "four corner pieces" of the Christian worldview:
When we teach the whole Christian worldview rather than just a subjective emotional experience, we elevate the conversation. We can confidently use apologetics, reason, logic, and scientific evidence (intelligent design) to show that the universe requires an ultra-intelligent Beginner. We do not have to hide our minds in our back pockets to be Christians; we can invite others into a robust, intellectually respectable conversation about the nature of reality.
Practical, Relational Guidelines for Non-Awkward Sharing
So, how do we put this into practice? How do we step "out of the building and onto the firing line" to interact redemptively with our neighbors without being weird? The Restoration theologians Jack Cottrell and Roger Chambers laid out several highly practical, common-sense principles for relational evangelism:
● Know Their Beliefs: Do not walk into a conversation blind. Take the time to understand where the other person is coming from. If they are secular, know the fallacies of naturalistic evolution. If they are in a cult, understand their specific, conditioned doctrines.
● Be as Positive as Possible: Evangelism is not about winning an argument or "straightening others out on facts.” It is about presenting the beauty and coherence of the truth. Focus on the majestic, self-giving love (agape) of God, who valued us enough as His image-bearers to pay an infinite price on the cross.
● Use the Bible Intelligently: Don't use the Bible as a lucky charm or a magical reference book. Treat it with historical and grammatical respect. Introduce others to the clear, straightforward, and historically reliable testimonies of the New Testament, especially the Book of Acts and Romans.
● Take a Warm, Personal Interest: True evangelism is relational. If we are to "truthify in love" (alētheuō), we must genuinely care about the person and meet them where they are.
● Frame Obedience Correctly: Do not present salvation as a legalistic checklist. When teaching about water baptism, help them understand that it is not a "work of law" to earn salvation, but rather the exact, beautifully designed occasion where personal grace covers personal sin, where God's grace meets our faith.
Conclusion
Sharing your faith does not require you to become an aggressive salesman or an emotional manipulator. If you are ready to let go of the high-pressure paradigms of subjective emotionalism and embrace the historical-biblical model of rational, loving instruction, the awkwardness will melt away.
Step out of the comfortable security of the parking lot and step onto the firing line. Engage your friends, your coworkers, and your community with reason, with absolute truth, and with a warm personal grace. You aren't performing mind surgery; you are simply helping them find the missing corner pieces to the beautiful picture of reality.
Socialism is the word of the day. Capitalism is increasingly criticized. People have strong opinions about both. Ironically, few can define either term, leaving many people uninformed about the ideas they so passionately espouse.
Encouraging parents to celebrate not only their children's achievements but also their character and spiritual growth.
When we return to the biblical and historic Restoration model of sharing the faith, we discover a way of talking about Jesus that is rational, relational, deeply respectful of human free will, and centered on teaching rather than manipulation.